@coins.clipclaps.me — Instagram Fake Follower Check
Last checked: August 2, 2026 · Audience breakdown estimated from engagement patterns
Estimated Fake Followers
0%
Excellent — very low fake share
Audience Breakdown
- Real followers:92%
- Suspicious / bots:0%
- Inactive accounts:8%
Key metrics
- Followers
- 75
- Following
- 295
- Posts
- 1
- Engagement Rate
- 25.33%
- Avg. Likes
- 16
- Avg. Comments
- 3
Signal breakdown
Each signal is scored independently and combined by weight into the final verdict.
Fake follower detection signals| Signal | Weight | Assessment | Details |
|---|
| Engagement rate vs. benchmark | 25% | Healthy | ER is 25.33% vs. a typical 6% for Nano (under 10K) accounts. |
|---|
| Likes-to-comments ratio | 15% | Healthy | About 5 likes per comment (a healthy range is roughly 30–120). |
|---|
| Engagement stability | 15% | N/A | Not enough posts to analyze. |
|---|
| Followers-to-following ratio | 5% | Healthy | Followers-to-following ratio looks normal. |
|---|
| Follower sample quality | 30% | N/A | Follower sample is not available from the current data source. |
|---|
| Comment quality | 10% | N/A | Comment texts are not available from the current data source. |
|---|
About this fake follower report
This report estimates how much of @coins.clipclaps.me's audience consists of real, reachable people versus bots, purchased followers, and inactive accounts. The audience quality score of 100/100 combines six weighted signals, including engagement rate versus the benchmark for accounts of this size, the likes-to-comments ratio, and post-to-post engagement consistency. An estimated 0% fake share places this account in the excellent range — very few suspicious followers. Results are recalculated at most once per week unless you force a re-check. Learn more on the fake follower checker page, or measure raw engagement with the engagement rate calculator.